Legal Opinion

McLennan v. McLennan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1897PublishedCited by 28 opinions

From Multnomah.: Loyal B. Stearns, Judge. Appeal by plaintiff from a decree of the Circuit Court of Multnomah County in favor of defendant in a suit brought to obtain a decree to declare void a marriage which had been contracted in alleged con-, travention to the provisions of the statute.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

On September 3, 1889, the plaintiff was divorced by the Circuit Court of Multnomah County from her then husband, and, in twenty-two days thereafter, while still a resident of and domiciled in this state, was married in Vancouver, Washington, to the present defendant, who was at the time also a resident and domiciled in Oregon. The plaintiff being advised that the latter marriage was premature and unlawful brought this suit to declare it void, which was decided adversely to her, and she brings the cause here by appeal. The sole question presented on the appeal is as to the validity of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Voorhis v. . BrintnallNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Commonwealth v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Pennegar v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Smith v. FifeWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Wilhite v. WilhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Evans v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Lanham v. LanhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Hall v. BaylousWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Sturgis v. SturgisOregon Supreme Court · 1908

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API