Legal Opinion

In Re Will of Yelverton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 28, 1930PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It is the contention of the propounders that the declarations of Harrison Yelverton, son of the alleged testator and one of the caveators, and the conversations he had with Paul Yelverton, another son and- administrator c. t. a. of the deceased, relative to the mental condition of their father, were not against the interest of said caveator, but decidedly in his favor, and, for this reason, were incompetent and should have been excluded. McDonald v. McLendon, 173 N. C., 172, 91 S. E., 1017; In re Fowler, 156 N. C., 340, 72 S. E., 357; Linebarger v. Linebarger, 143 N. C., 229, 55 S. E., 709;…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. State v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. People v. SweeneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Danville Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Gallivan Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Manufacturing Co. v. . Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Manufacturing Co. v. . Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Clement v. ClementSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Brewer v. . Ring and ValkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. In Re the Will of ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API