Clement v. Clement
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
The promise, if it may be so construed, made by the plaintiff to the defendant to refrain from exacting interest on the notes, was admittedly made some time subsequent to their execution and delivery, * and so was not a part of that transaction. It was made, too, if at all, long prior to the suit for enforcement and was, therefore, not in the course of that proceeding. It is difficult, then, to consider the act as a waiver, such as might be effectual without the support of a consideration. 56 Am. Jur. 100 n. 5. “Waiver,” has been defined as “an intentional relinquishment of a known right.”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- President of the Bank of the United States v. President of the Bank of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Hardin v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Aron v. Rialto Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- In Re Will of YelvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
3Cited by29 opinions
- Home Elec. Co. of Lenoir, Inc. v. HALL & UNDERDOWN HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING CO.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Guerry v. American Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Carter Ex Rel. Carter v. ClowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Lee v. Paragon Group Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Medearis v. Trustees of Myers Park Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.