Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Camhi & Undergarment & Negligee Workers Union, Local 62

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.

This matter was set down for trial to determine whether or not a written agreement providing for arbitration exists between the parties. It was tried upon a stipulated and agreed set of facts. The petitioner, Lewis Camhi (hereinafter referred to as “ Camhi”) was, between the years 1950 *94and 1959, a member of a partnership known as Dorothy Undergarment Co. (hereinafter referred' to as the “Company”). Prior to and during the time that Camhi was a partner in the Company, the latter was a member of the Allied Underwear Association, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the “Association”). The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Caplan v. CaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. People v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. In Re the Accounting of PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Louis J. Detrio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hartford Financial Systems, Inc. v. Florida Software Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1982
  2. Wisnouse v. TelseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. Ferreri v. First Options of Chicago, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Keller Construction Co. v. KashaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Lidberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API