Simpson v. Hegstrom
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Defendants-appellants Hegstrom and Bowen (“the Secretary”) appeal the district court’s ruling that the Secretary’s interpretation of a regulation implementing the Aid to Families of Dependent Children program (AFDC), Title IV of the Social Security Act of 1935 (“the Act”), was “unreasonable” and therefore invalid. At issue is the effect of one provision of the Act, which imposes sanctions on AFDC recipients who fail to cooperate with a State-run work incentive or “WIN” program, upon the Act’s provisions concerning the determination of eligibility and benefit amounts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lawrence E. GAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Neil Monet v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Gary D. HatcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Cervantez v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1989
- Simpson v. HegstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Figueroa v. SunnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- State of California, Ex Rel. State Water Resources Control Board State of California, Ex Rel. California Department of Fish & Game Edison Electric Institute National Hydropower Association v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Henwood Associates, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, American Rivers, Inc. Friends of the River v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.