Simpson v. Hegstrom
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
873 F.2d 1294
Dawn SIMPSON, Verla Van Velkinburgh, Sharon Collman, Jane
Doe, Teri Trosper, Sandra Foley, Oregon Human Rights
Coalition, on behalf of all themselves and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Leo HEGSTROM, individually and in his official capacity as
Director, Department of Human Resources of the State of
Oregon, Keith Putman, individually and in his official
capacity as Administrator, Adult and Family Services
Division of the State of Oregon, Defendant,
and
Otis R. Bowen, individually and in his capacity as
Secretary, United States Department of Health and
Human…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lawrence E. GAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Neil Monet v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Farley and Calfee, Inc. v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Oregon Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Vierra v. RubinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Figueroa v. SunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.