Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Hegstrom

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1989No. 87-3507PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

873 F.2d 1294

Dawn SIMPSON, Verla Van Velkinburgh, Sharon Collman, Jane

Doe, Teri Trosper, Sandra Foley, Oregon Human Rights

Coalition, on behalf of all themselves and on behalf of all

others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Leo HEGSTROM, individually and in his official capacity as

Director, Department of Human Resources of the State of

Oregon, Keith Putman, individually and in his official

capacity as Administrator, Adult and Family Services

Division of the State of Oregon, Defendant,

and

Otis R. Bowen, individually and in his capacity as

Secretary, United States Department of Health and

Human…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Lawrence E. GAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Neil Monet v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farley and Calfee, Inc. v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Oregon Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Vierra v. RubinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Figueroa v. SunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API