Oakley v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The defendant state commission on human rights and opportunities appeals from the trial court’s granting of the plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to General Statutes § 4-184a. The commission claims that (1) the trial court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiff’s motion because it was filed nearly five months after the final judgment was rendered, (2) the plaintiff is barred from recovering attorney’s fees and expenses because she failed to request them in her appeal petition, and (3) the amount requested by the plaintiff and granted by the trial court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bouchard v. People's BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Meadowbrook Ctr., Inc. v. BuchmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Bower v. D'OnfroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Oakley v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- TRAYSTMAN, CORIC AND KERAMIDAS v. DaigleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- McDonald v. RoweConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.