Legal Opinion
City of Stamford v. Kovac
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 6, 1994No. 11526PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
This matter is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. Previously, in Stamford v. Kovac, 31 Conn. App. 599, 626 A.2d 792 (1993), we concluded that the trial court had improperly accepted the report of the attorney trial referee and had rendered judgment against the defendant without allowing oral argument on the defendant’s exceptions and objections to the initial and supplemental reports of the referee. The Supreme Court granted certification, reversed our judgment and remanded the case to this court for consideration of the remaining issues raised by the defendant. Stamford v. Kovac,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Nor'easter Group, Inc. v. Colossale Concrete, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Doe v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Knock v. KnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- University of Connecticut v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Koennicke v. MaioranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- TDS Painting & Restoration, Inc. v. Copper Beech Farm, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Oakley v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Shawmut Bank v. Brooks Development Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Commissioner of Environmental Protection v. MellonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.