Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Ringor

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided September 13, 1977No. NCM 77 1157Published

1DissentGregory, Judge

I differ from the majority only in their application of the law to the facts of this case. I concur that failure of trial defense counsel to bring erroneous, inadequate, or misleading matters in a post-trial review to the attention of the cognizant reviewing authority constitutes waiver unless application of the doctrine of waiver would produce a manifest injustice or seriously affect the fairness or integrity of the proceedings. See United States v. Goode, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 367, 50 C.M.R. 1, 1 M.J. 3 (1975); United States v. Hodge, No. 77 0120 (N.C.M.R. 3 June 1977); United States v. Berry, 54…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. BoatnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. EllerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  5. United States v. BerryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API