Brunick v. Clatsop County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants on his wrongful discharge claims. He first assigns error to the trial court’s conclusion that, because plaintiff was an at-will county employee, the county was not obligated to afford him due process when it terminated his employment with the county. He asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that he was an at-will employee because (1) Clatsop County’s personnel policies created an implied term in his employment contract that provided for his termination from employment only for cause; and (2) he had…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. UmbehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alhassid v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Meyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Miller v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Curtis v. City of RedmondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Petrillo v. Public Employees Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.