Legal Opinion

Miller v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 27, 2013No. 081014715; A145318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

This case arises out of the City of Portland’s adoption and implementation of a return-to-work program for disabled firefighters. Plaintiffs, disabled firefighters who were required to return to work under the program, filed an action for breach of contract against the city in circuit court. In addition, plaintiffs alleged that the city, in its implementation of the return-to-work program, had breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing in the administration of their employment contracts. The city moved for summary judgment, asserting, among other things, that plaintiffs had failed to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Cecilia Nichols v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Docket No. 04-1445-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Application of Portland General Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Nutbrown v. MunnOregon Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Miller v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Miller v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API