Legal Opinion

Moores v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF MENDOCINO COUNTY

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 2004No. A105446Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAY, P. J.

This appeal involves concepts of merger and unmerger of contiguous parcels having common ownership under the Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code, § 66410 et seq.). Plaintiffs William M. Moores and Tona E. Moores brought suit for declaratory relief and for a writ of administrative mandate directing defendant Board of Supervisors for the County of Mendocino (County) to set aside a determination that plaintiffs’ parcels were merged. The trial court agreed with the County that its merger determination was proper according to state and local law. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The history of this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. San Diego Building Contractors Ass'n v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. In Re Marriage of FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API