Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Garces

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2002No. 91093PublishedCited by 209 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the jury’s answer to a special interrogatory is incompatible with the jury’s general verdict, and, if so, whether the special interrogatory controls. A jury returned a general verdict in the amount of $675,000 against defendant Dr. Rolando M. Garces and in favor of plaintiffs Jennifer Simmons (Jennifer) and Harold King (Harold), who had brought a medical malpractice action against Dr. Garces following the death of their infant daughter, LaTonya King. The jury also answered “No” to the special interrogatory: “Did dehydration contribute to cause…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Maple v. GustafsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Lee v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Griffith v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Lawson v. G. D. Searle & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Schaffner v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by209 opinions

  1. Snelson v. KammIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Young v. Bryco ArmsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Joseph Buechel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Blue v. Environmental Engineering, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005

204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API