Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Perez
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 18, 2004No. A03-1327PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On September 9, 2003, respondent Alfred Perez, Jr. admitted service of a notice of petition for disciplinary action against him. In the petition, the Minnesota Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility alleged that Perez had failed to notify the Director of a felony conviction and subsequent disciplinary proceedings in California. As a result, the Director petitioned that we disbar Perez or impose otherwise appropriate discipline. We appointed a referee to hear this matter and to issue his recommendation for discipline. The matter is now before us on the referee’s…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST McCOYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against AnderleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against ShoemakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Matter of Discipline of KraemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Conduct of GinsbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Linda A. BROST, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 182692Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against AndradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.