Legal Opinion

Requena v. State of Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 27, 2023No. 6:20-cv-00862Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PAUL ANTHONY REQUENA, Case No. 6:20-cv-00862-AA Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. GARRETT LANEY, Respondent. _______________________________ AIKEN, District Judge. Petitioner brings this action for federal habeas relief pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

and challenges his state court convictions for assault and firearms offenses. Petitioner contends that the trial court exhibited bias against him and deprived him of a fair trial in violation of his federal due process rights. The state court rejected Petitioner’s claim in a decision that is entitled to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API