Legal Opinion

Allen v. Reynolds

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2008No. 34369PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

In 2004, Christina Allen, an employee of Why Worry Ranch, LLC, (‘WWR”) lost her thumb when it was caught in a rope while she was tying a horse. Allen submitted a worker’s compensation claim to the Idaho State Insurance Fund (“SIF”). SIF refused to cover Allen’s injury, asserting that WWR was not covered by worker’s compensation insurance at the time of her injury. Anne Reynolds, the owner of WWR, contends a policy was or should have been in effect at the time of the injury. However, a referee for the Idaho Industrial Commission disagreed, finding that neither Reynolds nor…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hecla Mining Co. v. Star-Morning Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Obenchain v. McAlvain Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Painter v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. C & G, Inc. v. Canyon Highway District No. 4Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. The Highlands, Inc. v. HosacIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rangen, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Vawter v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Terrazas v. BLAINE COUNTY EX REL. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Williams v. Blue Cross of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Verdene Page v. McCain Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API