Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Donohue

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. —T. M'. McConnell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard

This controversy is over a fund now in the registry of the court below, where it awaits the determination of this cause. The defendant Donohue, before the bringing of the suit, had gone through the bankrupt court, and had received his discharge. The complainants claim the fund by attachment issued on debts which accrued after, this discharge was granted, while the defendants Stagmier and Fletcher rest their right to the same upon an assignment made to them by Donohue prior to the institution of the bankruptcy proceedings. The record shows that Stagmier and Fletcher were creditors of their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. WinslowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1843
  2. Field v. . the Mayor, C. of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  3. Pennock v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  4. In re HoweNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
  5. White v. CarpenterNew York Court of Chancery · 1830

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Spicer v. King Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Sullivan v. MyerTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Tennessee Brokerage Co. v. LarkinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
  4. Union & Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. Linden Street Christian ChurchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  5. Fox v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API