Legal Opinion
Spicer v. King Bros.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 13 opinions
FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County.' —Will D. Weight, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Justice Lánsden
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The complainant filed his original hill in the chancery court of Knox county, for the purpose of having certain transactions had between him and the defendants declared null and void under chapter 109, Acts 1905. The defendants demurred to the bill and the Chancellor sustained the demurrer and dismissed it, from which an appeal has been taken to this court and errors assigned.
*410The questions for decision involve the validity of the act referred to. Its caption is as follows:
“An act to regulate the business of lending money on personal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Ice & Coal Co. v. AlleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. Columbia, Godwin & Santa Fe Turnpike Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Mayor of Knoxville v. GassTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Green v. LanierTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
- Johnson v. DonohueTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kelleher v. MinshullWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Erwin Billard Parlor v. BucknerTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Tennessee Finance Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- McWhite v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- Crawford v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.