Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Pollock

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1992No. D013655PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

After the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant and respondent Perry C. Pollock, plaintiffs and appellants Esteban Raul Lucas, Guadalupe Reyes, and Mario Garcia Reyes (collectively plaintiffs), appeal. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c.) Plaintiffs’ action arose out of a fire in temporary migrant farm worker housing constructed on Pollock’s land, in which Lucas was gravely injured and plaintiffs Reyeses’ decedent, Jorge Reyes (Reyes), was killed. In granting Pollock’s motion for summary judgment, the trial court found Pollock had breached no landowner’s duties…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Dolquist v. City of BellflowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Farron v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Redman v. WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reyes v. KoshaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Mike Davidov Company v. IssodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Modern Development Co. v. Navigators InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Lucas v. George T. R. Murai Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API