Legal Opinion
Farron v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1989No. A044579PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLEY, J.
Carol Farron, Ted Fang and the San Francisco Independent (appellants) appeal from the judgment entered in favor of the respondent City and County of San Francisco (City) following the trial court’s granting of a motion for summary judgment. Appellants contend that the trial court erred in determining that the issue of whether the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act) (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.) 1 was violated by the mayor’s appointment of an advisory committee which included two members of the City’s board of supervisors was moot. We conclude that the issue is not moot in light of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- County of Madera v. GendronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Yoffie v. Marin Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Joiner v. City of SebastopolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brown v. RansweilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Fretland v. County of HumboldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Paduano v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Hesperia Citizens for Responsible Development v. City of HesperiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Lucas v. PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.