Legal Opinion
Dolquist v. City of Bellflower
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 1987No. B024895PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBERSON, J. *
Plaintiff, Bulah Dolquist, appeals from summary judgment in favor of defendant City of Bellflower and against plaintiff in a personal injury action.
I
Factual and Procedural Background
A. Nature of Action
This action arose as a result of personal injuries allegedly sustained in a fall by plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as appellant), when her shoe heel caught on a piece of rebar (reinforcing steel) protruding from the top of a concrete tire stop located on property owned by defendant (hereinafter referred to as respondent).
The alleged accident occurred on April 11, 1984,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Frazier, Dame, Doherty, Parrish & Hanawalt v. Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland, Teerlink & BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Barrett v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Fielder v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stratton v. First National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Paper Savers, Inc. v. NacsaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Hunsucker v. Sunnyvale Hilton InnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Kasparian v. Avalonbay Communities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.