Legal Opinion
Dupuis v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 5, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The plaintiff, by virtue of his office as building inspector of the town of Groton, is the enforcement officer for the zoning commission. Groton Charter § 7.3.3 (1960); 28 Spec. Laws 332, § 4 C. The defendants Francis J. and Lynn C. McIntosh, hereinafter called the defendants, appealed to the zoning board of appeals from the action of the plaintiff in denying them a building permit for an addition to their office building in a residential zone, and asked for a variance to allow the addition to their nonconforming building. The board granted the request, and the plaintiff, in his capacity as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tyler v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Planning Bd. of Springfield v. BD. OF SPRINGFIELDMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- West Hill Construction Corporation v. HorwathSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Allyn v. HullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
3Cited by8 opinions
- Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Wesley v. DeFonce Contracting CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Bouvier v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Superior Court · 1969
- Cohen v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Barton v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.