Legal Opinion

Bouvier v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 11, 1969No. File No. 92413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from the action of the defendant board in granting a variance to the defendant Monaco Construction Company, hereinafter called the defendant Monaco. There are two essential issues involved. One is the issue whether either or both plaintiffs are properly aggrieved parties entitled to appeal in this court. The other involves the question whether the board acted arbitrarily, illegally and in abuse of its discretion in granting the variance.

I

Taking up first the issue of aggrievement, the court finds the following facts.

1. The town of Monroe adopted zoning regulations in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  2. Dolan v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Gregorio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. Fox v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Burke v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Township of Dover v. Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. Lisbon P. Z. Comm. v. Lisbon Z. Bd., App., No. 546894 (Oct. 11, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
  3. North Stonington v. North Stonington, No. 544966 (Aug. 24, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
  4. Planning Zon. Comm'n v. Zon. Bd. of Appeals, No. 105428 (Jul. 8, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API