Legal Opinion

Todd v. Joyner

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 2, 2009No. 26722PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones

This case stems from an auto accident in which Petitioner Frances Irene Todd was injured. A jury awarded Todd $37,191.11. Petitioner appealed and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Todd v. Joyner, 376 S.C. 114, 654 S.E.2d 862 (Ct.App. 2008).1 We granted certiorari and, finding no error, now affirm the Court of Appeals.

FACTS

A car driven by Joyner collided with a car in which Todd was a passenger. Todd sustained injuries and sued for damages. State Farm, Joyner’s insurer, defended her at trial. Joyner admitted negligence and the trial court directed a verdict on liability. Consequently, the sole…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yoho v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Todd v. JoynerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burke v. AnMed HealthCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Manios v. Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, LLPCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Ray v. DraegerAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Riley v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  5. Luchok v. VenaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API