Legal Opinion
Todd v. Joyner
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided November 27, 2007No. 4315PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STILWELL, J.:
Frances Irene Todd appeals several evidentiary rulings of the trial court as well as the trial court’s denial of her motion for a new trial nisi additur. We affirm. 1
FACTS
On September 4, 2002, Todd and Barbara C. Joyner were involved in an automobile accident in Georgetown, South Carolina. As a result of injuries sustained in the accident, Todd brought this action. Joyner stipulated to her negligence in the case. 2
On February 27, 2006, Joyner made Dr. Richard J. Friedman available for deposition as an expert in the field of orthopedic surgery. Friedman was not available to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Pike v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Bonser v. ShainholtzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Dunn v. Charleston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Poston v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Todd v. JoynerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Todd v. JoynerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009