Legal Opinion

Hicks v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1999No. 96-CF-956PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

Found guilty by a jury of two counts of armed robbery and related weapons offenses, appellant contends that a show-up identification of him by one of the victims and physical evidence (chiefly a sawed-off shotgun) seized from the car in which he was riding should have been suppressed as the fruits of a Fourth Amendment violation. Although we conclude that the search of the car was unlawful because done without probable cause, we agree with the trial judge that the shotgun and the identification of appellant were both admissible under the doctrine of inevitable…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Coghill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Pinkney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. In re I.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Prince Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API