Legal Opinion

ESTATE OF JAMES A. RUSSICK v. KOENIG

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 10, 2020No. 1:13-cv-07773Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ESTATE OF JAMES A. RUSSICK, 1:13-cv-07773-NLH-AMD GAIL RUSSICK, EXECUTRIX, GAIL RUSSICK, INDIVIDUALLY, OPINION Plaintiffs, v. TOM KOENIG and ANNA MARIE KOENIG, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, Defendants. TOM KOENIG, Cross-Claim Plaintiff, v. ANNA MARIE KOENIG, Cross-Claim Defendant. APPEARANCES: RICHARD T FAUNTLEROY RICHARD T. FAUNTLEROY, P.C. 1525 SOUTH MAIN ST. PLEASANTVILLE, NJ 08232 On behalf of Plaintiffs TOM KOENIG 11808 KINGSTON PIKE SUITE 190 KNOXVILLE, TN 37934 Defendant/Cross-Claim Plaintiff appearing pro se HILLMAN,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Chanel, Inc. v. GordashevskyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  4. Alford v. AlfordTennessee Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API