Legal Opinion

Alford v. Alford

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J.,

delivered the opinion of the court,

in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.

OPINION

We granted permission to appeal in this divorce case to determine: (1) whether the Court of Appeals erred in applying a “joint benefit” definition of marital debt and holding that debt incurred by Wife during the parties’ ten-year separation was marital debt; and (2) whether the Court of Appeals correctly allocated this debt when it held that Husband should be required to pay Wife’s marital debts. We hold that debts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Carbide Corp. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hass v. KnightonTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re the Marriage of ScoffieldMontana Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Larsen-Ball v. BallTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. K.B.J. v. T.J.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  3. Luplow v. LuplowCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  4. ESTATE OF JAMES A. RUSSICK v. KOENIGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API