Legal Opinion

Rode v. Dellarciprete

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 4, 1990No. 89-5131PublishedCited by 393 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

This appeal stems from an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Appellants, prevailing parties in a civil rights action, sought attorneys’ fees and costs of $186,328.88; the district court awarded them fees and costs of $54,746.02. Appellants argue that the district court committed several errors in determining their fee, specifically the court’s rulings regarding delay compensation, duplicative or excessive work, the contingency and negative multipliers, the sufficiency of the fee petition and the fee generated preparing the fee…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by393 opinions

  1. Sandra Cortez v. Trans UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Abrams v. Lightolier Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. McKenna v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Hurley v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Martin O. Washington v. Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Martin WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

388 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API