Legal Opinion
Boaz v. Martin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 8, 1924No. 12824PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
This is an appeal from the order of the district court of Jefferson county wherein such court refused to vacate and set aside a judgment which had been recovered therein against the plaintiff in error, P. A. Boaz, hy the defendants in error, O. A. Martin and J. E. Howard.
The judgment in question was recovered by the said defendants in the court below on the 24th day of December, 1920, on a cross-petition filed by them in said cause. The original petition was filed by the plaintiff there, plaintiff in error here, to recover on the alleged balance due on two promissory notes for the respective…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Manning v. Roanoke & Tar River RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- McLaughlin v. NettletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Anderson v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Peterson v. KochSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Hodges v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. MueggeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Stewart v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- First National Bank v. KerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- City of Duncan v. AbramsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Johnson v. Bearden Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.