Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Bearden Plumbing & Heating Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 27, 1934No. 22762PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The record in this case shows that Bearden Plumbing & Heating Company filed its petition to foreclose its mechanics’ and materialman’s lien on certain properties located in the city of Tulsa, Okla., embracing both labor and material furnished by this plaintiff company to the defendants, Grant Johnson and Mrs. Grant Johnson, nee Senie Tucker; that summons was duly issued and served on each of said parties; that W, E. Winn, doing business as the W. E. Winn Lumber Company, made application to the court, and leave was granted to intervene in said cause and foreclose its lien against said property…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Forest v. AppelgetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Boaz v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Washington Savage v. DinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Levy Bros. v. Board of Com'rs, Noble Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Uncle Sam Oil Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leslie v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Moran v. City Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Mid-Texas Petroleum Co. v. Western Lumber & Hdwe. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Plains Growers, Inc. v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Plains Growers, Inc. v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1974