Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Bogert

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1959No. 8805PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Plaintiff’s (appellant's) original complaint sought damages for personal injury, resulting from a fall in the home of defendants (respondents), on the ground of negligence. The record does not show a ruling by the trial court on defendants’ demurrer thereto.

Pursuant to leave granted, plaintiff filed an amended complaint containing two counts. Plaintiff on her first count seeks recovery on the theory of contract based upon an alleged agreement between plain tiff and defendants, by the terms of which the tort claim was compromised and settled; by the second count plaintiff seeks…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Comeau v. ComeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Stearns v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Laube v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Douglas F. Warner v. Donat Rossignol v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  2. Fort Wayne National Bank v. DoctorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Fedders Corp. v. BoatrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. E.W. Burman, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  5. World Wide Lease, Inc. v. WoodworthIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API