Legal Opinion
United States v. Hayat
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 2013No. 07-10457PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BERZON; Dissent by Judge TASHIMA.
*880OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
Hamid Hayat, born in California in September 1983 and raised largely in Pakistan, was convicted of providing material support to terrorists, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339A, and of making false statements to government officials, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The terrorism statute criminalizes providing “material support or resources” to terrorists. The prosecution’s case was that Hayat violated the statute by providing his services to terrorists when he attended a terrorist training camp in Pakistan and…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Cesar GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Ruslan KirilyukCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Wesley Kingsbury v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Victor Trillo v. Martin BiterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Arturo Albino-LoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.