Legal Opinion
Williams v. Fitzhugh
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 12, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.
The declaration in this ease alleges that the defendants, who constitute the board of trustees of .the State Formal School a.t Bowie,
“on or about the 25th day of August, 1921, engaged the services of the plaintiff as a teacher at the State Formal School, at Bowie, for the school year 1921- 1922, at and for the sum of nine hundred and sixty dollars per year, payable in monthly instalments; that on or about the 12th day of February, 1922, the plaintiff was dismissed without cause from the said State Normal School at Bowie, no charges of any kind whatever having been preferred against him, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- State Ex Rel. Weddle v. Board of County School CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
- Qdweyler v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- State Ex Rel. Watkins v. RichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Fisher & Carozza Bros. v. MacKallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Board of Trustees v. John K. Ruff, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- University of Maryland v. MaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Hampton v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Stern v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State, Use, Clark v. FerlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.