Legal Opinion

Qdweyler v. Gibson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 1, 1909PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Niles, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

The appellees on this record, as the heirs at law of Thomas King Carroll and wife, are the owners in fee of the land sued for in this case. It comprises the-bed of what was formerly Constitution street in the City of Baltimore. This street was dedicated to public use by Mr. Carroll and his wife in 1831 by certain grants of lots abutting thereon, but by the terms of the conveyances the title to the street itself remained in the grantors, and that title is now vested in the appellees.

The State, finding it necessary to enlarge and extend the Maryland Penitentiary, provided, by the Act of 1900,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Smith v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Bacon v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Lee v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Clea v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API