Legal Opinion

O'Neal v. . Mann

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 26, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

This appeal was docketed at the Spring Term, 1926, of this Court, after the call of appeals from the First District, and shortly before the expiration of said term. By consent of counsel, it was submitted without oral argument, upon printed briefs of both sides. Rule 10. A brief in support of the judgment of the Superior Court was filed by Hon. Stephen O. Bragaw, with the permission of the Court, as amicus curies.

An examination of the record disclosed that the question presented for decision was of grave importance not only to the parties to this controversy, but also to owners of lands…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Columbus Mills v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1850
  2. Lutterloh v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Southern Assembly v. . PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Elizabeth City Water & Power Co. v. City of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Sanderlin v. LukenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  2. Broadhurst v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. In re Drainage of Ahoskie CreekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Lang v. . Development Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Castevens v. . Stanley CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API