Legal Opinion
Sanders v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided September 13, 1947No. 15988PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Oxner, J.:
The principal question to be determined on this appeal is whether under the statutes hereinafter mentioned the Overbrook Water and Sewer Sub-District may be extended and enlarged so as to include (1)) a certain area lying within the Greater Greenville Sewer District but not previously made a part of a sub-district, and (2) another area which lies entirely outside of the original boundaries of the Greater Greenville Sewer District.
In 1925 an act was passed creating as a “body politic”-the “Greater Greenville Sewer District”, consisting of the territory included in the Greenville…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Browning v. HooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Embree v. Kansas City & Liberty Boulevard Road DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Ashmore v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mills Mill v. HawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Tovey v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Distin v. BoldingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Atkinson Dredging Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Marino v. ZdanowicaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.