Legal Opinion

In re Drainage of Ahoskie Creek

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaeKBR, J.

Respondents in the record have a grouping of their exceptions at the end of the charge to the jury, and before the judgment and appeal entries, but the grouping of their exceptions contains no language that they assign the matters or things referred to in their exceptions as error.

However, we will discuss their exception to the denial by the court of their motion for judgment of involuntary nonsuit made at the close of all the evidence. G.S. 1-183.

Respondents first contend that their motion for nonsuit should have been allowed for the reason that all the evidence shows that the Bertie,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Bridges v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Thompson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Cecil v. . Lumber CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mills v. DunkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Fortune v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Fortune v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API