Legal Opinion

Newco Leasing, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1983No. Civ. 66506PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs Southwest Leasing Corporation (Southwest) and Newco Leasing, Incorporated (Newco), both California corporations, instituted an action against defendant, the California State Board of Equalization (Board), seeking a refund of use taxes paid under protest.

Both actions, involving nearly identical facts and issues, were consolidated at the superior court level and tried before a judge sitting without a jury on an agreed statement of facts and limited testimonial and documentary evidence. The trial court entered judgment for defendant Board. Plaintiffs have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Culligan Water Conditioning of Bellflower, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Union League Club v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. International Business Machines v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Simplicity Pattern Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Market St. Ry. Co. v. Cal. St. Bd. Equal.California Court of Appeal · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beatrice Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cal-Metal Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Industrial Asphalt, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. California Attorney General Opinion 23-701, California Attorney General Reports2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API