Industrial Asphalt, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, J. *
Facts
The facts were stipulated, but a very brief summation establishes that Industrial and Huntmix were (and are) California corporations doing business in asphalt-related endeavors. They formed a joint venture partnership (referred to hereinafter as Venture) to do the same type of business.
Industrial contributed assets of $46,307,000 to Venture, which assumed liabilities of $10,342,000. Thus, a net value of the assets from Industrial was $35,965,000. Huntmix contributed assets of $21,328,000 to Venture which assumed liabilities of $3,806,000 for a net contribution of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cal-Metal Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- MacRodyne Industries, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Newco Leasing, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- Beatrice Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Schuler v. Albright CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2015