Legal Opinion

Industrial Asphalt, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1992No. B052993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEPHENS, J. *

Facts

The facts were stipulated, but a very brief summation establishes that Industrial and Huntmix were (and are) California corporations doing business in asphalt-related endeavors. They formed a joint venture partnership (referred to hereinafter as Venture) to do the same type of business.

Industrial contributed assets of $46,307,000 to Venture, which assumed liabilities of $10,342,000. Thus, a net value of the assets from Industrial was $35,965,000. Huntmix contributed assets of $21,328,000 to Venture which assumed liabilities of $3,806,000 for a net contribution of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cal-Metal Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. MacRodyne Industries, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Newco Leasing, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beatrice Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Schuler v. Albright CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API