Legal Opinion

Simplicity Pattern Co. v. State Board of Equalization

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1980No. L.A. 31243PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWMAN, J.

Plaintiff Simplicity Pattern Company appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant Board of Equalization. The judgment denies a refund of sales tax on the transfer of film negatives and master recordings used to make audiovisual materials that help train nurses, paramedics, and other medical personnel. The transfer was part of a sale by plaintiff of the segment of its business devoted to producing and marketing such materials, consummated in 1971 through an exchange of the assets and name of its wholly owned subsidiary, Trainex Corporation, for common stock of (but less than…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Culligan Water Conditioning of Bellflower, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Carmona v. Division of Industrial SafetyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. International Business Machines v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Fox Bakersfield Theatre Corp. v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Roehm v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Preston v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wallace Berrie & Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Comptroller of the Treasury v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Duffy v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Orange Unified Sch. Dist. v. Rancho Santiago Cmty. Coll. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API