Legal Opinion
Madison v. Graham
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 23, 2002No. 01-35145PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TROTT, Circuit Judge.
Harvey and Doris Madison, Charles and Elena d’Autremont, and Harrison Saunders (collectively “appellants”) appeal from the district court’s published decision dismissing their complaint with prejudice. The appellants sought to have Montana’s Stream Access Law, Mont.Code Ann. §§ 23-2-301, et seq., declared unconstitutional on the grounds that it (1) violated their Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process rights, and (2) was void for vagueness. The district court held that (1) the appellants’ substantive due process claim was in reality a Fifth Amendment takings…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Squaw Valley Development Company Squaw Valley Ski Corporation Squaw Valley Preserve v. Martin Goldberg Harold SingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Crown Point Development, Inc. v. City of Sun ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Ventura Mobilehome Communities Owners Association, an Unincorporated Association v. City of San BuenaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Madison v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cleghorn v. Blue Shield Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.