Legal Opinion

Squaw Valley Development Company Squaw Valley Ski Corporation Squaw Valley Preserve v. Martin Goldberg Harold Singer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 20, 2004No. 02-17346PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

Squaw Valley Development Company, Squaw Valley Ski Corporation and Squaw Valley Preserve (collectively, “Squaw Valley”) filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that two employees of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region (the “Lahontan Board”) subjected them to selective and over-zealous regulatory oversight in violation of their constitutional rights to equal protection and substantive due process. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the employees, Harold Singer and Martin Goldberg, on the ground that they…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Lazy Y Ranch Ltd. v. BehrensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. North Pacifica LLC v. City of PacificaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Elaine Brittain v. William Hansen Rebecca Scott County of San Bernardino, and Brian Campbell, C0191Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Chester A. Lauth v. Daniel L. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API