Legal Opinion

Crown Point Development, Inc. v. City of Sun Valley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 1, 2007No. 18-1168PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYMER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to decide whether a developer may state a claim for relief based on the allegedly arbitrary and irrational denial of a permit application. The district court said not, relying on our decision in Armendariz v. Penman, 75 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc), which held that the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause subsumes or “preempts” substantive due process claims. Accordingly, it dismissed the complaint by Crown Point Development, LLC (Crown Point) against the City of Sun Valley and members of the City Council.

Crown Point appeals, arguing that it may…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. North Pacifica LLC v. City of PacificaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. A HELPING HAND, LLC v. Baltimore County, MDCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  4. Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Action Apartment Ass'n v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API