People Ex Rel. Foltz v. Gifford
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was under the Red-light Abatement Act (Stats. 1913, p. 20) and resulted in. a judgment of abatement as a nuisance of certain buildings used for prostitution in the city of Tracy, in the county of San Joaquin. The appeal is here upon the judgment-roll alone and we can see no merit whatever in the position of appellants.
[1] It appears that after the evidence was heard the action was dismissed as to the occupant of the building, and it seems to be the claim of appellants that thereby the plaintiff lost the right to prosecute the cause any further; in other words, that the action must…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- McCarthy v. Gaston Ridge Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Carter v. LothianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gananian v. WagstaffeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Abbott v. CavalliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Shupe v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Golden Eagle-Bobtail Mines, Inc. v. Valley National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1943
- People Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. American Art Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.