Gillespie v. Fender
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Supersedeas. Denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In view of the facts stated in the petition, the application for a writ of supersedeas must be denied.
It is clear that there is no merit in the appeal from the order denying the motion to vacate the judgment for deficiency entered against the petitioner here. The sole ground of the motion to vacate the judgment was that the judgment is void and that the same was entered by the court without jurisdiction. This claim was based entirely upon the proposition that the complaint in the action, one for the foreclosure of a mortgage, had not stated facts sufficient to show any liability on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crouch v. H. L. Miller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by18 opinions
- Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Estate of KeetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Associated Oil Co. v. MullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Sheehan v. All Persons, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.