Legal Opinion
American Cyanamid Co. v. Hammond Lead Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 15, 1974No. 73-1506PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
Can a Maine corporation, with principal headquarters in New Jersey, bring a diversity action in New Jersey against an Indiana corporation and an Indiana resident ?
The district court answered the question in the affirmative in its Order denying the defendants’ motions to dismiss for lack of venue under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(a) and certifying the issue to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b).
American Cyanamid Company (Cy-anamid), a Maine corporation whose *1184principal headquarters are located in New Jersey, a state in which it does business,1…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Strick Corp. v. A. J. F. Warehouse Distributors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1975
- Amoco Production Co. v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1979
- Eric R. Rosenfeld v. S.F.C. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.