Legal Opinion

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided July 3, 1975No. Civ. A. 75-H-884PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff has filed suit in this Court seeking to enjoin the defendant Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and defendant members of the Commission from attempting to enforce a subpoena duces tecum issued to plaintiff pursuant to an investigation of the natural gas industry-being conducted by the FTC. Plaintiff also seeks to enjoin three other corporations, defendants Getty Oil Company (“Getty”), Continental Oil Company (“Conoco”) and Cities Service Company (“Citgo”), from complying with similar FTC subpoenas issued to them…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. Henry v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. United States v. TexasDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1981
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. State of Tex.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API