Legal Opinion
Tapp v. Perciful
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 28, 2005No. 99,779PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHargrave, J.
11 There is no dispute about the basic facts. Tonya Harman, a State Farm insured, took her vehicle to Auto Tech in Ponea City for a tune-up, brake repair and valve job. Auto Tech is owned by Wayne Perciful. Two days later, Mr. Perciful was moving the vehicle while repairing it. The vehicle lurched forward and struck the plaintiff, Karen Tapp, who was standing nearby. 1 The vehicle also hit a truck owned by Karen Tapp and/or her husband, James Tapp.
T2 The Tapps sued Tonya Harman, Wayne Perciful and Auto Tech. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs against Defendant Wayne…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Equity Mutual Insurance Co. v. Spring Valley Wholesale Nursery, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Harkrider v. PoseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Young v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Pierce v. Oklahoma Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Hartline v. HartlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ball v. Wilshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Brown v. PatelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Sensebe v. Canal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Proformance Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Mulford v. NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.