Legal Opinion
Hartline v. Hartline
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 13, 2001No. 87046PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
T1 The dispositive question tendered on certiorari is whether an automobile ability policy exclusion, which operates to deny all coverage to a named insured who is injured while riding as a passenger in the insured vehicle, violates the legislative policy underlying Oklahoma's compulsory insurance law. We answer in the affirmative, but only insofar as the injured person is left sans the minimum mandated coverage.
*767ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
T2 On 22 September 1993 Glinda Hartline ("Glinda"), a passenger in a 1975 Ford driven by her husband, James Hartline ("James"), sustained bodily injuries in an…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Transamerica Insurance v. RoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Ball v. Wilshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- SILOAM SPRINGS HOTEL, LLC v. CENTURY SURETY COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- O'NEILL v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.